Name? Taken together, there were never "use cases and verifiable needs"įor 64-bit hardware in the first place. >you know of any, please SHARE! (get it? :-)Ĭan't those arguments, both for and against, be applied to any language you >We are gathering use cases and verifiable needs for AMODE 64 COBOL, so if >do not think very many users will need AMODE 64 in the next 10-15 years. > Unlike AMODE 31, which we expected EVERYONE to move to (still waiting :-) we >compiled for AMODE 31 even after we ship AMODE 64 COBOL. >to solve specific business problems, and that in general 99% of code will be >We assume that AMODE 64 COBOL will be used for very specialized one-off cases >Also, does everyone realize that AMODE 64 code will run slower than AMODE 31 code? >I (like the other poster) would like to know what you would do with AMODE 64 COBOL? >AMODE 64 COBOL is still being worked on here at IBM. >64 Bit mode.Please lead me if you have such a experience. >Hi,I am looking for COBOL compiler option to compile our COBOL programs in =
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |